We have, with no little success, sought to keep the world off balance; pulling out rugs, upsetting tea tables, setting off firecrackers. It has been the office of others to reassure; ours to unsettle. Australopithicenes, Tricksters, Clicks, Megaliths--we hawk the anomalous, peddle the strange. Merchants of astonishment."
Ibid., p. 275
I mean, how can you not love this.
"Looking into dragons, not domesticating or abominating them, nor drowning them in vats of theory, is what anthropology has been all about. At least, that is what it has been all about, as I, no nihilist, no subjectivist, and possessed, as you can see, of some strong views as to what is real and what is not, what is commendable and what is not, what is reasonable and what is not, understand it.
I was thinking of doing a thread on cultural relativism, because we'd covered that in class today, but then I fell down a Clifford-Geertz-shaped rabbit hole.
Geertz, C. (1984). Anti anti-relativism. American Anthropologist, 86(2), 263-278.
Anyone who has concerns about the damn thing should just read his article - if they can get through the rather beautiful prose, that is! No sarcasm - I am enjoying it thoroughly myself, but like all good prose, it takes effort.
Just re-upping this offer: because being comfortable with git is a barrier to entry to many FS/OSS projects, and because I care deeply about lowering those barriers, I will tutor anyone who asks for help with git, and/or connect them with any mentor(s) they might prefer.
I'll do this while I put energy and work into making the tool more approachable, and into making better tools and learning paths.
Boosts gratefully appreciated.
"You must also keep in mind that your information might not be used by you and not at all as you intended. Soviet ethnography had a tradition of keeping very detailed records: name, age, family, address, and so on. The researchers who worked at the Amur river in the first half of the 29th century wrote about shamanism.
My students asked me a few classes ago what "sensitive information" meant in regards to the study of religion, and what sort of ethical issues one needed to consider when doing fieldwork. I recalled the following story, taken from a lecture given on March 29. 2015, by prof. Dmitiry Funk. The translation of the quote is mine.
This gets dark, so the next toots are CW.
Yes, by all means: explore the culture, learn about us, listen to our stories, and we will do our best to do the same for you. This is essential so that when the time for joint action comes, the naive questions will have already been asked. But do your explorations with the same tactical quietness that you would have afforded your own fight.
Because the goal, in the end, isn't "fuck you, got mine." It's to win freedom, ours and yours both.
But if there are active hostilities going on, treat other people's fight as you would your own fight. This means keeping the exploratory play private, and should you by some chance need to go public with your ideas and perceptions of the topic, it means taking pains to learn and be very careful around what exactly you're saying and how it'll impact other people's struggle.
It also means that you probably shouldn't be using that particular narrative to further your own agenda.
If there's no active hostilities going on (i.e. what you're playing around with is ancient history that isn't being used as a political weapon right now): go nuts. Borrow. Reimagine. Play games with your kids (especially important to introduce them to other people's history) and with other adults (same!). Theater and movie productions where the only limit is the creators' imagination.
And yes, you can use that stuff in combination with your own present agenda. I don't see a reason why not.
For my own ethics, I think, the key question to check when doing an adaptation is: "are there active hostilities going on?"
What do I mean by "hostilities"? The examples are numerous. America and its ongoing struggle with a history of slavery, immigration, the reservations of Native Americans and so on. China and Hong Kong. And yes, the Russian-Ukrainian war, which is a colonial war.
And the reason I'm thinking of "for freedom, ours and yours" so early in the morning is because of the Chornobyl PoC tweets.
Now, I haven't seen Chornobyl the series: not a big series fan, really, and I just know that's gonna be a history rabbit hole when I get around to it. So my musings are entirely based on "how to etiquette when adapting a history that's not your own."
If there's one thing interesting about being a historian of magic is that it never gets dull.
Not every day you find out a favorite musician of yours was a changeling who, at one point, went back to the lands of faery, and the young boy taken there instead of her won his freedom from the fairy queen with a song and returned to take back his own life.
Can I write my thesis as a wiki?
I'm stuck on a piece in my background chapter which could go three different ways depending entirely on how I structure it. And I just want to write three separate tiny subchapters and hyperlink to them, so people could read them depending on what they actually don't know and need to find out!
Latest Existential Comics made me have a literal LOL moment. Because "once tried to merge minds with an illithid to better understand Underdark social structures" sounds like an absolutely incredible death, one that a few of my characters would probably die to!
Humanities scholar, tech geek.
Current header image is by Yuumei, check her out! https://www.yuumeiart.com/
mastodon.acc.sunet.se is run by the Academic Computer Club at Umeå University located in Umeå, Sweden. ACC is actively involved in several open source projects and we provide mirrors for Debian, Ubuntu, Gnome and GIMP. We also host servers for the Gimpnet, Freenode, and OFTC IRC networks. You can read more about our projects and our servers on the ACC website.